Thursday, December 27, 2007

Benazir Bhutto(1953 - 2007) Who is the assassin?



The world lost another young, visionary, liberal,dynamic leaders to the hands of dark coward forces. Benazir Bhutto assassinated at 1830 local time was the two time and the only woman prime minister Pakistan ever had

The moment the incident happened, media and information sources started going all out to cash on their EVENT, or some to drill in information they want people to believe for what ever motives they have.Numerous TV channels got people glued to their TV sets with stories on what kind of a lady and leader Benazir was, what would be the future of Pakistan as a nation, and PPP as a party.Several archived interviews were played to show probably the association those tv channels had with Benazir Bhutto.

The question which now would surface and much stronger too would be Who is the master mind behind this assassination?

Is Pervez Musharraf the assassin?

I was surprised that a reputed news channel much praised as The Channel for News kept on driving the point that it could be Pervez Musharraf who is responsible for the assassination.There were statements which were made to the effect that it was Pervez Musharraf's brain behind this assassination. Now well, I'm not a journalist and neither am I looking at monetising this unfortunate incident.I'm just using common sense here.Pervez Mushharraf who is the military dictator of Pakistan who is always been at the receiving end for being the dictator and for every wrong reason, would be according to me the last person to do such a stupid act.Come on and think about it, are we saying that Musharraf does not have simple common sense to understand that he would be the obvious prime suspect and accused in the event such an incident happens? Especially at a stage when Musharraf is trying his best to build a public clean image, this would be the last thing he would do.

Is Navaz Sherrif the assassin?

If a person can benefit out of the entire incident that was executed with only cheese cakes to take home, would be Navaz Sherrif.He and the media has already managed to put Pervez Musharraf on the spot for the assasination of Benazir Bhutto.With the people of Pakistan believing the media and using their spontaneous reaction to label Pervez Musharraf as the culprit, it is again common sense that Nevaz Sherrif would take home sympathy and winning votes in the event next election happens in Pakistan.

Hey where is Mr Bush?

Even after two hours after the assassination White House kept mute on the event.CNN correspondent did not do a great job of covering up what she honestly spilled that Mr Bush is in Mexico enjoying his holidays and probably does not know about the event.She had to come back later probably on a scodling from her boss to remind the world that Airforce one has the best communication systems on this planet and for sure Mr Bush is informed and would comment on the incident a little later.Yeah right, we remember how Mr Bush reacted after the WTC was brought on 9/11.Now does Mr Bush get benefited again if political unrest continues or gets worse in Pakistan? Well, if Benazir Bhutto was against militancy and terrorism and she would put an end to it if she had to come on power, does that mean that Mr Bush would probably lose out on a possible market for his arms, ammunitions and military parading?How would he repeat another Iraq and Afghanistan and edge closer to India if terrorism is killed in Pakistan? Is it favorable to Mr Bush that terrorism and militancy continues in Pakistan.We all know that Mr Bush has always been on the look out for politically disturbed nations to sell his arms, ammunitions and capitalise on that nations resources.